Governance

Quarterly board reports framed as impact

Enter the quarter's membership, revenue, events, wins and shortfalls. Civitas writes a report under two pages that opens with a four-sentence summary and names the problems before a board member does.

Start free

The problem

Board reports tend to list everything the staff did. Boards want to know what it produced and what went wrong. The director who raises the shortfall first keeps the room.

What you answer

  • Which period does this cover?
  • Where does membership stand?
  • How did revenue look?
  • Which events ran and how many attended?
  • What went well, and what did not?
  • What is the focus next quarter?
  • Is the board asking about anything in particular?

What you get

  • A four-sentence summary a board member can read on its own
  • Retention alongside growth, when your numbers allow
  • Revenue against budget
  • A plain paragraph on what did not work and what is being done
  • The questions the board is most likely to ask, with short answers
Sample output

Fair Haven, Georgia is a fictional town used for examples.

Q3 summary

Q3 was a mixed quarter. Dues came in $3,000 ahead of budget, but sponsorship fell $8,000 short after two major sponsors did not renew. Business After Hours averaged 70 attendees, up from 45. Rebuilding the sponsor pipeline is the priority for Q4.

Who it is for

Executive directors who report to a volunteer board each quarter.

Questions

Will it make up numbers I did not give it?

Any figure you did not supply is marked [confirm]. It never estimates membership or revenue.

Why does it insist on including shortfalls?

A report with no problems reads as evasive, and board members usually know the bad news already.

Related documents

More Governance documents

Your next newsletter is due Thursday.

Start free